But M'sia's tightly regulated property market may obstruct plans
AFTER much ballyhoo about real estate investment trusts (Reits) in Malaysia a year ago, three of the four listed on the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange continue to be below water. The Securities Commission, Malaysia's market regulator, wants to change all that. In early July, the Commission changed the guidelines regulating Reits, effectively allowing them to increase their gearing to 50 per cent from 35 per cent previously. It was also reported that the agency said that gearing could be increased to above 50 per cent if approved by unit-holders. The increases in gearing, defined as borrowings over total assets, would allow local Reits, currently criticised as too small, to borrow ahead of new acquisitions, thus allowing them greater flexibility. Reits in Australia, Japan, Korea and the US have no limits on gearing while those in Singapore are allowed to gear up to 60 per cent of assets.
Better still is a recommendation by the Commission to the Ministry of Finance ahead of Malaysia's Sept 1 budget that the withholding taxes be cut from 29 per cent to zero. The agency also reportedly recommended payment of tax-free dividends to unit-holders for five years. The withholding taxes were a major irritant to foreign investors - the most successful Reit, Axis, for example, has a foreign shareholding of less than 9 per cent - and could boost the Malaysian market significantly. In Singapore, by way of comparison, withholding taxes are capped at 10 per cent.
The proposals, if implemented, will be widely welcomed and illustrate the country's belated recognition that the competition for attracting global funds is both intense and incentive-driven.
Reits were introduced in Malaysia over a year ago following its success in places like Singapore but have not really taken off partly because interest rates have moved up at least 80 basis points over the same period. Meanwhile, most of the Malaysian Reits are small, and again except for Axis, generally expand their portfolios by buying assets from their holding companies. Pricing has also been a concern with most of them priced at yields between 6 and 7 per cent. But ultimately analysts agree that Malaysia's tightly regulated property market where government approvals have to be sought for foreign purchases of office blocks could be the biggest crimp on igniting interest in Reits. 'What we need is a more vibrant property market with a speedier and more transparent approval process,' said Lim Beng Leong, the head of research at securities firm UOB KayHian in Kuala Lumpur.
PETALING JAYA: The performance of real estate investment trusts (REITs) on Bursa Malaysia has been subdued since they burst into the investment scene about a year ago. At the market's close yesterday, Axis REIT finished flat at RM1.67, Tower REIT and UOA REIT were unchanged at RM1.05 and RM1.13 respectively while Starhill REIT was down 1.5 sen at 97 sen. Of the four REITs, Axis REIT has chalked up the biggest price gain since listing, rising 42 sen over its initial public offer price (IPO) of RM1.25. Starhill REIT is up one sen versus its IPO price of 96 sen. And based on yesterday's close, UOA REIT and Tower REIT are down two sen on their IPO prices of RM1.15 and RM1.07 respectively.
REIT managers said the lacklustre performance of the four trusts was due to a combination of macro-economic factors such as higher interest rates and the tax levied on foreign investors. While researchers and analysts shared this sentiment, they said REIT managers should also seek to inject new assets into their portfolios.
KSC Capital director of research Choong Khuat Hock said only Axis REIT had acquired new properties since it went public. “If we look at successful REITs in the region, like in Singapore and Australia for example, growth comes from the acquisition of new assets with high yields,” Choong told Starbiz. He pointed out the price of Singapore's Ascendas REIT had doubled to S$2.20 (RM5.06) from S$1 at the end of 2003. “Its spectacular growth is due to a successful acquisition strategy that has more than doubled its asset base over the last two years,” he said. Choong said the Government could make REITs more attractive because their valuations were influenced by interest rates. “A rise in interest rates will negatively impact REITs as investors can enjoy more attractive returns from deposits and bonds,” he said. He said government-linked companies (GLCs), with their large fixed-asset holdings, could lead the way by freeing up funds for capital investment in their own core businesses. The Government, he added, could also identify one REIT to manage all GLC properties.
Axis REIT Managers Bhd executive director Stewart LaBrooy said REITs had lost some of their shine because investors were rebalancing their portfolios due to the increase in interest rates last year. “All the REITs are fully priced but that can change with the strengthening of the ringgit and a possible new tax structure,” he said.
LaBrooy said the Government should also consider lowering the withholding tax to attract foreign investors. He said the Singapore Government had halved the withholding tax on REIT distributions to foreign non-individual investors to 10% for five years beginning last year, and there was no tax on locals. “It has proved very popular among retirees who prefer solid consistent yield for their money,” he said, adding that Axis REIT's foreign shareholding was about 8.75% at the end of last year. LaBrooy agreed with Choong that REITs could not afford to be static, “because people will lose interest.” “We are constantly looking for properties, particularly in the Klang Valley, to improve our asset value,” he said, adding that Axis REIT's asset value was set to expand to RM370mil with the recent purchase of a RM10.3mil logistics centre and two properties worth RM45.4mil in Petaling Jaya and Shah Alam.